Which is better Mitsubishi Lancer or Toyota Corolla

Reliability, quality, comfort - three components that car enthusiasts value so much in their “iron horses”. That is why many people prefer Toyota cars, especially the C-class sedan - the Corolla model. The Japanese manufacturer tirelessly improves its brainchild. Today, car enthusiasts can enjoy the tenth generation Toyota Corolla - a high-tech, stylish, compact, and most importantly safe car. In its class, Toyota Corolla competes with another “Japanese” – Mitsubishi Lancer X. What are the main differences between “classmates” and what should you give your preference to?

Toyota Corolla VS Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer X or Toyota Corolla 10, which is better?

Today in our review we will compare two popular Japanese C-class sedans. Connoisseurs may argue, remembering that the Lancer was also produced in a hatchback body, but now we will talk about the most popular versions in Russia. Do the Toyota Corolla X and the Mitshubishi Lancer X have anything in common, or is the country of production the only thing that unites the two cars beloved by the public?

Lancer X with its entire appearance is trying to show that the blood of its illustrious older brother flows in its veins - the Evolution model, a “charged” sports sedan. Aggressive body contours, sweeping lines of the hood, turning into a “mouth” clearly marked by the radiator grille, narrow beveled headlights, giving the car the appearance of a predator preparing to jump.

The tenth generation Toyota Corolla looks completely different - at first glance you get the feeling that in front of you is a family car, completely devoid of racing ambitions, intended only for safe and comfortable movement.

But here’s what’s strange - with very similar dimensions of the cars (4570 * 1760 * 1505 mm for the Lancer versus 4620 * 1775 * 1465 mm for the Corolla), the family Toyota has a noticeably lower ground clearance - 15 cm versus 16.5 cm for the Lancer. And, although 15 cm is quite enough for moving along the city roads of Russian megacities, an extra one and a half centimeters will be very useful in bad road conditions. That is, the clearance of the Lancer, which claims to be sporty, turns out to be greater than the clearance of the seemingly much calmer Corolla. Could this not affect the smoothness of the ride?

Behavior on the road

Both the Lancer X and the tenth generation Corolla are purely city cars. The suspension of both sedans is energy-intensive enough for comfortable movement on city roads, but it should be noted that the Lancer is noticeably stiffer (another reference to Evolution?), and, as a result, follows the trajectory set by the steering wheel much more clearly. At the same time, the steering wheel is, as they say, informative - the driver feels that he is in control. Unfortunately, the inevitable price for better handling is a lower level of comfort when overcoming holes and potholes. Here the Corolla gets a well-deserved “point” - if the Lancer wants to be like its charged brother in both appearance and handling (we’ll talk about the engine line a little later), then the Corolla strives to follow the concept of the flagship Camry in everything. Hence the smooth ride (of course, hardly comparable to that of the Camry), and the curves of the body lines, and, one might say, some imposingness on the road.

By and large, we could have stopped at this point, because when choosing a car, the driver is primarily guided by the main “habitat”. But it would be rude on our part not to highlight, in particular, the line of power units.

Lancer X or Honda Civic

The Honda Civic is able to compete with the Lancer 10. The car has good dynamic performance. Noise insulation is a level higher than that of Mitsubishi. The engine's reliability level corresponds to the 1.8 liter Lancer X engine, which is famous for its long service life.

Civic 8 will help you not to get lost in traffic. Its design is filled with futurism. Dynamic performance is not inferior to Lancer 10.

Honda Civic 8

The power plant of the Civic 4D is quite reliable, but like on 1.5 liter Mitsubishi engines, coking occurs when reaching 100 thousand km. Structurally, the power unit is more advanced than the one and a half liter Lancer 10 engine.

The disadvantage of the Civic is that the suspension is too soft. When cornering, rolls occur, and when driving over bumps, the shock absorbers often break through.

Engines and transmissions

Both sedans in Russia were offered only in a gasoline version. We strongly do not recommend taking economical, but exotic diesel engines in our area - although the myth about bad domestic diesel fuel has long been dispelled (in particular, by the author of the review), exoticism can come back to haunt you with serious expenses for repairs and a long wait for the necessary spare parts.

A Lancer buyer in Russia could choose between three petrol versions - 1.5, 1.8 and 2 liters. Their power is 109, 143 and 150 horsepower, respectively. All engine options could be equipped with an automatic transmission. It’s just that the archaic nature of the old four-speed automatic, even if it is famous for its reliability and has an enviable resource, negates all hopes of efficiency - the actual fuel consumption in the urban cycle for almost all owners exceeds the mark of 10 liters per hundred kilometers. On the highway it is possible to achieve 6.5 liters per “hundred”, but only on condition of very measured driving - again, hello to the old “automatic”.

Almost all tenth-generation Toyota Corollas presented today on the secondary market are equipped with a 1.6-liter gasoline engine producing 124 horsepower. There are also more economical versions with a 1.3 liter engine. The transmission can be selected either manual or automatic (variator). The Corolla's tank is 4 liters smaller - 55 liters versus 59 liters for the Lancer. Considering the slightly greater appetite of the car from Mitsubishi, the range of the cars is approximately the same.

It would be most reasonable to compare the dynamic characteristics of approximately identical versions of cars, in our case - a one and a half liter Lancer and a 1.6 Corolla. With such engines and manual transmissions, cars demonstrate similar speed characteristics - the real maximum speed of the Lancer is 187 kilometers per hour, the Corolla can be accelerated a little more - up to 192. The dynamics of acceleration to one hundred kilometers per hour declared by the manufacturer is 10.8 seconds for the Lancer, Toyota for It will take 0.3 seconds less to overcome this mark.

As expected, the car interiors fully correspond to the images that emerge while looking at these cars from the outside. Imitation of metal in the dashboard trim, deep-set (each in its own well) speedometer and tachometer, gear shift lever located so that it fits in the hand - this is not a complete list of claims to sportiness that the Lancer abounds in. Operating a car with such clearly expressed elements typical of sports cars will definitely appeal to young people. But what’s strange is that the steering wheel is adjustable only in one plane, height. That is, it may not be possible to adjust the landing in the most convenient way.

The designers seem to have taken practicality and comfort as the basis for the Corolla's interior. But, in my opinion, it is overly conservative, perhaps even a little boring. Soft seats, the ability to adjust the steering wheel both in height and reach, the steering wheel cut along the chord at the bottom - everything seems to hint to us that the car is family-friendly and friendly.

Reviews from owners about the Lancer's interior are similar in that the interior is quite noisy, so if you are buying a car for yourself and for a long time, it would not be a bad idea to make sound insulation. There are some complaints about the trunk volume - 315 liters is enough for city driving, but when traveling long distances you will have to choose what things you need to take with you and what is better to leave at home. The Corolla's 450-liter luggage compartment looks much more impressive against this background.

Advantages and disadvantages

Lancer owners were not boring clerks, but crazy young people. Every self-respecting lance driver considered it his duty to “give a corner” and take part in a speed race. They did not pay attention to front-wheel drive, low-power engines, and also to the fact that the Lancer Evolution, which they tried to imitate, is a completely different car that has nothing in common with the “civilian” versions of the ninth and tenth generations. Lancers often got into accidents, bumpers were scratched and torn off. Therefore, it will not be possible to find a fresh car on the secondary market.

The body of both generations does not boast of durability and a thick layer of paint, so all used cars are sold already repainted, without exception. Lancer owners did not spend money on repairs and maintenance because they chose budget cars that would not need to be looked after. The new Mitsubishi Lancer was truly unpretentious. However, the same cannot be said about a used car.

The electrics of the “nine” are simple, so there’s nothing special to break. The same principle works with the interior and multimedia. Lancer X sometimes crackles with electric current in the wires, at least due to the fact that, unlike its predecessor, it has an on-board computer, electronic assistants and comfort options.

The trunk of the “ten” is a little more than 300 liters. You can't transport cargo in it, but a barbecue grill and a shish kebab will fit. True, the picnic table and chairs will have to be placed in another car. For example, in the “nine”, because the penultimate generation has a larger trunk and more space in the back row of seats.

The ground clearance height of both the “nine” and the tenth generation is 165 mm. This is enough to avoid scratching the curbs with your nose.

Which is better Mitsubishi Lancer or Toyota Corolla

Every car enthusiast, when planning to buy a new car, thinks about which model to give preference to. If you want to buy a reliable and comfortable sedan, then two options come to mind: Mitsubishi Lancer and Toyota Corolla.

Both models are quite popular in our country; Russian residents actively buy and use them. Each of the machines has its own characteristics, pros and cons. It is worth considering them in more detail in order to ultimately decide which car is better to buy.

Image and drive of Lancer IX and X generations

The “Nine” wins in terms of technical parameters, but the “Ten” outperforms its predecessor in design, appearance and relevance. What is more important to you: image or drive? Ask Mitsubishi fans which is better: the Subaru WRX or the Mitsubishi Lancer, and they will choke on their saliva trying to prove who is the real road conqueror. But if you ask them about which generation of the latest Lancers is better, they will argue with each other all day long, admiring the legendary nature of the model.

The design of the Lancer IX is praised only by its owners; everyone else understands that the predatory animal appearance of the anniversary generation is more modern and original. The salons are also very different from each other. If inside the “nine” there is nothing at all except the steering wheel and an abundance of creepy plastic, then the “ten” in comparison looks like a futuristic ship.

Also read: Skoda Rapid review: pros and cons of the model

In move

Power units

The basic Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a 1.6 engine with 117 horsepower - not much for a sports car, but quite enough for a small sedan. The Mitsubishi engine is quite noisy, which is noticeable immediately after starting - its hum penetrates the cabin, forcing you to increase the volume of the conversation in order to be heard by the interlocutor. But at the start, the Mitsubishi Lancer shows itself quite sluggishly - the car accelerates so slowly and impressively that it seems as if you are driving an old Volga. The character of the power unit installed on the Lancer changes only after 4000 rpm, when acceleration suddenly becomes confident and assertive. However, the moment has already been lost - to reach 100 km/h, Mitsubishi needs almost 11 seconds.

The archaic four-speed automatic transmission equipped with the Mitsubishi Lancer surprises with its quick shifts and dynamic character. As if aware of the dual nature of the engine, he tries to hold low gears for a long time, allowing him to bring the Lancer tachometer needle almost to the red zone. If you press the gas pedal with the tip of your finger, it will try to shift earlier, saving fuel - although four gears will still not be enough for a modern car. It is pointless to talk about the fuel efficiency of the Mitsubishi Lancer, since during city driving the fuel consumption fluctuates around 9.5–10 liters/100 km.

To understand which is better, it’s worth saying right away that the Toyota Corolla, with 5 more horsepower and more weight, has better dynamics. It gains almost 0.5 seconds when accelerating to “hundreds” and can reach 195 km/h versus 190 km/h for the Mitsubishi Lancer. A small advantage, but Toyota is not at all positioned as dynamic and sporty. The Corolla's engine starts to pull well from minimum speed and allows for quick maneuvers, although in some cases it lacks power. It does not have such a clear separation of two operating ranges as a competitor - the characteristics of the Toyota Corolla power unit are linear, which means predictable feedback when you press the gas pedal.

Toyota installs a continuously variable transmission on its compact sedan, which turns out to be much better than an automatic transmission at city speeds. When driving below 80 km/h, Corolla always accelerates quickly and automatically selects the optimal gear ratio for the situation. Moreover, the Toyota Corolla does not have the disadvantage of early cars with a CVT - the gear ratio does not change smoothly, but according to a program that includes six virtual steps, which allows you to get rid of the annoying monotonous noise. However, at high speed, the Corolla no longer behaves so predictably - when you press the gas, the car raises the speed, but the acceleration intensity leaves much to be desired. The main value of the CVT lies in its ability to really save fuel - the average fuel consumption of the Toyota Corolla does not exceed 8 liters.

Comparisons of Mitsubishi Lancer and Toyota Corolla

When the new Mitsubishi Lancer entered the market, the world community was excited - its appearance was the most aggressive among inexpensive compact sedans. It is thanks to its stylish design that Lancer has gained immense popularity - both in Russia and other countries. But is its reputation as an inexpensive sports car deserved? To understand this, we will compare the Mitsubishi Lancer with another popular Japanese sedan, which is the Toyota Corolla. This way we can understand who is more dynamic and who is ahead of the competitor in terms of comfort - Mitsubishi Lancer or Toyota Corolla.

COROL 111

Shall we take it? But adding only 28,000 rubles, you will buy a much more functional, comfortable and elegant sedan - with central armrests, leather steering wheel, heated windshield, high-frequency speakers and fog lights. This car is called “Comfort” and costs 819,000 rubles with a CVT. - we, perhaps, recognize it as the optimum. Although there is still room for doubt here - after all, by paying an additional 24,000 rubles, which is quite modest in these days, you will receive light alloy wheels and a rear view camera in the “Comfort+” .

In move

Power units

Chassis

If you need to choose a Lancer or Corolla, you should take a close look at the behavior of the Mitsubishi on the road so that it does not become a surprise later. When driving on a flat road, the Mitsubishi Lancer is as stable as a rock and clearly follows steering turns, preventing any roll even in sharp turns. In addition, Lancer does not allow rocking even on waves of crushed asphalt and does not lose directional stability after driving through small bumps or wet areas. However, shaking at the joints of road slabs and deep cracks already serves as a bad signal. It can be assumed that the Mitsubishi Lancer will show its full potential on a broken country road.

SUMMING UP

Our task is not to choose the best car, but to indicate priorities. In other words, to help you navigate.

Toyota Corolla is one of those cars that are chosen with the mind, not the heart. For those who like to study tables and graphs, there is probably no other solution. True, the price is already pretty steep. And one more thing: for a tall and broad-shouldered driver, the spacious Corolla, both in appearance and according to the results of measurements, will feel a little cramped.

Mitsubishi Lancer, at first glance, has gone far from the Karizma that preceded it on the market, although in fact the distance is not so great. Having received a more pretentious appearance and different chassis settings, it, in fact, remained a solid, average-capable car. A good alternative to Toyota due to a more attractive price and a workplace convenient for a large driver.

Five years ago, the Ford Focus laid claim to the crown of class leader. But the time of his reign is coming to an end. Although it still pleases with a spacious interior and pleasant roads

Practicality and comfort

The front seats in the Lancer have an optimal profile - they greet the driver and passenger quite welcomingly, allowing you to quickly find the ideal position for a long trip. However, the steering column in Mitsubishi can only be adjusted by tilt angle - which means that only people of average height will be really comfortable here. The Mitsubishi Lancer's instruments are located in two deep wells with individual visors, like in a sportbike. They look impressive, but once you look to the right, you'll see the Mitsubishi's blank front panel, where it's impossible to find a single design element that stands out.

The rear sofa of the Mitsubishi Lancer can be praised for its width, but the sloping roof limits the maximum height of a person sitting here at 180–185 centimeters. There is nothing for tall people to do here, since in the Lancer they will also prop up the front seats with their knees. In addition, the profile of the backrests and pillows does not promise comfort on a long journey - here they are almost flat, which forces Mitsubishi passengers to frequently change their body position. The tiny trunk of the Mitsubishi Lancer, the volume of which is only 315 liters, is completely upsetting. Practical people will not be pleased with its large loading height, narrow opening and low-hanging hinges.

If you compare Lancer or Corolla in terms of interior design, it is difficult to name a winner. Of course, the Toyota's front panel is littered with LCD screens, buttons and switches, but the budget-class feel is ineradicable. The reason for this is the low height of the Corolla's front panel, as well as the use of narrow central air vents and a long, winding groove in the CVT control lever. The front seats are as good as those in the Mitsubishi Lancer, but their cushions are not too high. But they delight with very grippy combined upholstery, and the steering wheel is adjustable both in tilt and reach.

The Toyota rear sofa is also very roomy, with plenty of space between the two rows of seats and overhead. In addition, the profile of the pillows and seats looks much more preferable for a long trip - and the Toyota Corolla is so comfortable that passengers can sleep through even a very long journey. Of course, miracles don’t happen and three tall men can’t fit in a compact class car - but people of average height will definitely not feel cramped in the Corolla. The Toyota trunk cannot be called a record - its volume is only 452 liters. But it's much larger than what Mitsubishi offers and doesn't have prominent wheel arches.

Toyota Corolla or Mitsubishi Lancer 10

Motorists often have disputes about which car is better. It is especially difficult to choose when purchasing. Toyota Corolla vs Mitsubishi Lancer is a fairly relevant comparison, since it is between these two cars that you often have to choose. They have several similar features, but also have individual characteristics that you need to keep in mind when planning to make a purchase.

Exterior and interior features

When comparing Toyota vs Mitsubishi Lancer, you won’t have to look closely at these cars for long. The Lancer's striking appearance immediately catches the eye: it is an aggressive car, with sharp features and hinting at its sporting purpose. Toyota, on the other hand, has a less aggressive design, its appearance is calm, its features are rounded. It's safe to say that the Corolla looks much more boring.

The cars are almost identical in size. Toyota has a length of 4545 mm, with a wheelbase of 2600 mm, the Lancer is slightly larger: the length is 4570 mm, the wheelbase is 2625 mm, but the Corolla is almost 100 kg heavier. The Lancer's trunk is significantly inferior in volume - 315 liters vs 450 liters.

If you need to carry bags when traveling with your family, then Toyota will be a more comfortable option. Its interior is more spacious, with much more space in the back.

Engine characteristics

If we compare the basic versions, the Lancer 10 has a 1.5-liter engine with a power of 109 hp. With. The Corolla's power unit is slightly different - 1.6 liters with a power of 124 hp. With. The maximum possible speed for both cars is approximately the same: 191 km/h for the Mitsubishi and 195 km/h for the Corolla. To accelerate, despite its phlegmatic appearance, Toyota requires less time: it is ahead of its opponent by almost 2 seconds.

If you want to save on fuel, then you need to take a closer look at the Lancer 100, since it consumes about 8 liters in the city, and Toyota – about 9.

On the highway the difference is also about a liter. However, not everything is as simple as it seems at first glance. The Mitsubishi lineup offers more powerful Lancers, and Toyota, in turn, also produces cars with a 1.3 liter engine.

Comparison of Lancer X and Ford Focus

If the car owner has a large appearance, then it is better to refuse to purchase a Ford Focus. The interior is too cramped for people whose height exceeds 180 cm. The car also has a number of minor technical shortcomings:

wipers do not clean the windshield well;
condensation forms in the headlights;
The quality of plastic in the pre-restyling version is low, so to avoid “crickets” you should choose Focus 2;
poor visibility in the rear view mirrors;
chafing of the trunk lock wiring.

Ford Focus

You should choose the Ford Focus if you want to own a car with a diesel engine. It is highly reliable. The remaining engines have a shorter lifespan and are very demanding, although they do not suffer from oil loss like the 1.5 liter engine from Mitsubishi. In general, this car is designed for measured, city driving.

This is interesting: Wheels for Hyundai Solaris: size, bolt pattern

Chassis comparison

When choosing a Corolla or a Lancer, many buyers look not only at price and appearance, but also evaluate the comfort of the car. In this regard, it is unlikely that anything else can be compared with the Toyota Corolla. The car moves smoothly, smooths out turns, and absorbs hits from potholes. Toyota's handling is excellent, even in conditions where the car does not feel very comfortable (when the road is very bad): the height of the Toyota, whose ground clearance is 15 cm, allows you to feel confident both in urban conditions and on the highway. The car has high-quality brakes that can stop it at high speed. For example, braking at a speed of 100 km/h will take a segment of 40 meters.

In search of where the Shumka is better, you will again return to Toyota, since the manufacturer has significantly increased these indicators. The cabin is very quiet, you can hardly hear the engine running or noise from the street.

Mitsubishi Lancer differs from its competitor quite sharply. Its suspension is much stiffer, which is why the driver and his passengers will feel the bumps on the road very well. The Lancer's steering wheel is sensitive, handling is good, the car shows high maneuverability both in city traffic and on the highway. The Mitsubishi's braking distance at a speed of 100 km/h is 37 meters.

Both cars have additional functions in the form of anti-lock brakes, on-board computer, stabilization, heated seats, power steering, central locking, etc. Both manufacturers took care of the attractiveness of the interior, high-quality wear-resistant materials are used, and the instruments are convenient. The appearance is modern, everything is at hand.

The Lancer is well suited for those who value an original appearance, a sporty appearance, and drive mostly without passengers. Toyota is a universal car, it is comfortable not only for the driver, but also for passengers, has more free space in the cabin and trunk, and is more dynamic. Both cars are approximately the same in quality, so the choice should be based on your personal experience, preferences, and tastes.

Which Lancer to buy

The best Lancer of the tenth generation is a two-liter engine with a manual gearbox. With it, the owner will receive design, modernity and cheap maintenance. The car will confidently hold the road and be pleasant to drive. All other characteristics will depend on the replaced parts and driving styles that the car has experienced. There will be minor problems, from weak paintwork to burnt-out electrics, and major ones, such as regular suspension repairs.

If the antediluvian interior design and the lack of at least some comfort and style do not bother you, then the 1.6-liter engine with automatic transmission is the ideal of the ninth generation. Lancer IX has proven itself better in technical terms: its design is simpler, there is nothing particularly broken in it. With at least minimal maintenance, even a used car will last for a long time. In addition, the “nine” is cheaper.

Servicemen and fans of the brand are also inclined towards the ninth generation. On the road, the Lancer IX is in no way inferior to the “ten”, and there are fewer technical problems with it.

In any case, you will have to be prepared to choose long and carefully. Cars are problem-free and budget-friendly, so the service life of parts, assemblies and spare parts is not eternal. The previous owners probably didn't take much care of the cars.

Carefully select advertisements, check the car's history, send it to professionals for inspection, and only then make your choice. But keep in mind that an adequate copy is on sale for no longer than one week.

Toyota Corolla VS Mitsubishi Lancer: which car is better?

Toyota Corolla VS Mitsubishi Lancer

Differences visible to the naked eye

The Mitsubishi Lancer X is available on the market in both sedan and hatchback body styles, while the Corolla hatchback is a separate model - the Toyota Auris. The non-standard appearance makes the Lancer stand out in a crowd of boring cars. The car suits both bright colors, emphasizing the agility and dynamism of the car, and more conservative ones, emphasizing its power and impressive technical characteristics. The exterior of the tenth Lancer is similar to the Evolution model, which gives the car aggressive and sporty features. The pronounced wedge-shaped profile, raised rear part, elongated hood, narrow radiator grille and slightly “squinted” headlights give the Mitsubishi Lancer X a rather menacing appearance.

Aggressive and dynamic Mitsubishi Lancer

The appearance of the Toyota Corolla is quite conservative. Smooth lines and laconic forms give the car nobility and have a pronounced resemblance to its “big brother” - Toyota Camry. Elongated headlights tapering towards the center, a wedge-shaped false radiator grille, and a more defined, sharp rear bumper enlivened the exterior of the tenth generation Toyota Corolla.

The main parameters of both cars are almost identical: Toyota Corolla reaches 4545 mm in length with a wheelbase of 2600 mm, Lancer X is slightly larger - 4570 and 2625 mm, respectively. At the same time, the Corolla is heavier (1380 kg versus 1245 kg for its competitor).

The undoubted advantage of the Corolla is its more spacious trunk (450 liters versus 315 liters allocated for the trunk in the Lancer).

A look from the inside

The interior of both cars is functional and ergonomic, and the interior is spacious and comfortable. When creating machines, high-quality finishing materials are used. The steering wheel in the Toyota Corolla is flatter and wider at the bottom, which not only makes driving more comfortable, but also increases the driver’s legroom. The instrument panel is informative and convenient, equipped with bright lighting. The analogue speedometer is equipped with an on-board computer display, and the tachometer is equipped with digital indicators of engine temperature and fuel remaining. The steering wheel is adjustable in height and depth. The front seats are soft, with a lot of adjustments.

Comfortable interior of Toyota Corolla

The Mitsubishi Lancer salon has pronounced features in a sporty style. The speedometer and tachometer are displayed in stylish separate “wells” with metal rims, the rest of the data is displayed on the on-board computer. Silver imitation metal inserts add chic to the interior. The central panel is not independent, but is a smooth continuation of the dashboard. The steering wheel in the Lancer is adjustable only in height. The front bucket seats are quite firm and hold passengers well when cornering.

Luxury and style in the interior of Mitsubishi Lancer X

Thus, the tenth generation Toyota Corolla and Mitsubishi Lancer X, despite similar technical characteristics and classmate status, are the closest competitors with pronounced differences. The smoothness and softness of the Corolla's ride are combined with a rather modest and conservative exterior. The agility and dynamism of the Lancer X comes complete with a rigid suspension. When choosing which car is better, each motorist is guided by his own taste, personally determining the significance of the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

Read more: Toyota Camry or Toyota Corolla

Comparing technical parameters of cars

The basic Mitsubishi Lancer X is equipped with a 1.5-liter engine producing 109 hp. Toyota Corolla has a 1.6-liter, more powerful engine (124 hp). The Toyota Corolla, despite its external restraint and elegance, turns out to be faster than its rival: the maximum speed declared by the manufacturer for the Corolla reaches 195 km/h in manual mode, and for the Lancer X – 191 km/h. Toyota accelerates to 100 km/h in 10.2 seconds, while the Lancer shows an indicator of 11.7 seconds. The torque of Toyota in this configuration is higher than that of Mitsubishi.

Stylish and seasoned Toyota Corolla

Mitsubishi Lancer X with a 1.5-liter engine is more economical both in the city (8.2 l/100 km versus 9 l of consumption of the 1.6-liter Corolla), and on the highway (5.4 l versus 5.8 l/100 km), and in the combined cycle (6.4 l and 7 l/100 km for the rival). At the same time, the Corolla’s gas tank volume is 4 liters less. Lancers with a larger engine capacity are, accordingly, more powerful and consume more fuel. A more economical Toyota Corolla with a 1.3-liter engine is available for sale.

The soft suspension in the Toyota Corolla allows the car to move smoothly and quietly, with comfort for the driver and passengers. Bumps on the road are not the best environment for demonstrating the capabilities of a car, but even their car runs confidently and smoothly, demonstrating good grip and handling. High-quality brakes increase the safety of the car: deceleration from a speed of 100 km/h occurs in a distance of 39.3 m. In the tenth generation, the sound insulation of the interior was improved, so that extraneous sounds do not bother you when driving.

Mitsubishi Lancer turns out to be the complete opposite of Toyota. A stiffer suspension transmits even minor bumps. At the same time, the car has better handling, a more sensitive steering wheel, and is maneuverable. Good grip and road grip. The braking distance at a speed of 100 km/h is shorter than that of the competitor: 37.8 m.

An on-board computer, stabilization systems, anti-lock brakes, electric windows, central locking, heated seats, and airbags are available in both models.

Lancers' mileage problems

The average cost of the ninth Lancer is 329 thousand rubles, an excellent price tag for a reliable sedan from Japan with budget maintenance. To check, consider a 2004 model with a mileage of just over 150 thousand km. Engine 1.6 with 98 liters. With. and automatic transmission.

In 2021, the car's mileage was more than 200 thousand km, in 2021 - already 150 thousand km, and in 2021 - 90 thousand km.

Since the beginning of this year, the car has been pledged to the bank.

But that's not all. The car has one accident and a copy of the title. Overall, not the best option to buy.

Also read: Toyota Vitz II (XP90): All the pros and cons of the city weasel

Maybe we'll get lucky with the last generation. For the tenth Lancer, the average price is 407.6 thousand rubles. We found a beautiful 2013 model with mileage up to “hundreds”.

The 1.8 liter engine with 140 horsepower and a CVT is a powerful, modern and, unfortunately, problematic car.

Another year of manufacture and 4 accidents, and these are only officially registered. The repair work was calculated based on eight episodes. The insurance company calculated losses of more than half a million rubles.

With three owners, Lancer has already been issued a copy of the title. And this is a reason to wonder what happened to the original document.

Also read: Opel Astra H review: is it really that bad?