Russian car enthusiasts clearly love the Toyota Camry for its combination of relatively affordable cost and high reliability, which have turned this business-class car into a long-term sales leader. For a long time he simply had no direct competitors. However, there is a first time for everything. Another Japanese company made their own very similar model. Will Accord be able to compete on equal terms with the new legend? Time will show. However, before that, you can try to compare these Japanese according to all possible indicators. So, Honda Accord or Toyota Camry, which is better?
Toyota Camry 2020
Comparison of technical characteristics
The comparison will be made on the basis of basic technical characteristics, and to make it correct, similar modifications will be taken: Honda with a 2.4-liter power unit with a power of 180 horsepower and a torque of 228 Nm, paired with a 5-speed automatic transmission , and Toyota will have a 2.5-liter engine with a power of 181 hp and a torque of 231 Nm, mated to a 6-speed automatic transmission. The Accord is made in Japan, the Toyota Camry is assembled in Russia. Fuel tanks are not very different. The Accord has 66 liters, the Camry has 70 liters. Toyota has 10 liters more luggage space and amounts to 505 liters, while Honda has 495 liters, respectively. As for weight, the Accord is 50 kg lighter. Its curb weight is 1490 kg, while the Camry has 1540 kg.
The Camry is 4 cm shorter than the Accord and has a length of 4850 mm. For Honda, this parameter is 4890 mm. Its height is 1 cm greater. The wheelbases are the same. Toyota's ground clearance is 1.5 cm higher. The wheel sizes are the same and are 215/55 R17. The Camry's mixed consumption is half a liter less. The machines are really very similar to each other in their technical characteristics.
Toyota Camry 40
Produced from 2006 to 2011. For the Russian market, it was initially produced in Japan, and since 2007 it began to be assembled in the Leningrad region.
Technical characteristics for Russian models:
4-cylinder gasoline engine, volume 2.4 liters, power, depending on the year of manufacture, from 163 to 167 hp. Automatic or manual transmission. There are also models with a 3.5 liter engine. Fuel consumption in the city for a car with a 2.4-liter engine is on average 14 liters, on the highway 8 liters per 100 km.
Despite the general similarities, there is a key difference between the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry:
- In terms of comfort, the first car is designed for drivers, and the second for passengers.
- However, the automatic lever is designed more conveniently in the Camry.
- The Honda has 2-stage heated seats, while the Camry has 1-stage.
- It is easier to sit in the Camry, since the distances from the seats to the ceilings are greater, but there is little legroom.
- With the Accord, everything is exactly the opposite.
- The Honda's steering wheel is smaller and more comfortable; in general, it is more pleasant to be in the driver's seat.
- Climate control works worse.
- There is plenty of space in the back, but the sofa is not adjustable.
- Sound insulation is worse than Camry.
Engines and transmission
The Honda Accord has two powertrain options: a 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine developing 180 hp. and a 6-cylinder 3.5-liter engine with 280 hp. Only the Sport version with the first engine option comes with a manual transmission; all other trim levels come with an automatic transmission.
Toyota Camry has a larger set of engines. The car can be equipped with a 2-liter engine with a volume of 150 hp, a power unit with a volume of 2.5 liters, developing a power of 181 hp. and the flagship “engine” with a volume of 3.5 liters and a power of 250 hp. Moreover, the latest power unit is much more torquey than the 280-horsepower Honda engine. All Toyota models are equipped exclusively with an automatic transmission, a little slow, but very reliable.
It is worth noting that for such a car the 2-liter engine is, to put it mildly, rather weak. In some modes, it simply cannot cope with its responsibilities. Other Toyota engines are similar to Honda ones, but are inferior to them in terms of dynamics. Based on this, the 2-liter Camry can only be recommended to calm pensioners who are afraid to press the gas pedal once again.
The answer to the question of how the Accord and Camry engines differ will be more complete after finding out how powerful and economical they are. Obviously, both models have a small range of engines. By removing the weakest engine, you can see that more powerful power plants with the stated performance demonstrate, oddly enough, similar dynamics. As already mentioned, the top-end Camry engine is a little faster (by 0.1 seconds).
When comparing the base engines, there is no clear winner. Although, the Honda engine accelerates to hundreds 0.4 seconds slower than the Toyota one. Engine efficiency is also approximately the same: the Accord has 10.9 liters in city mode, and the Camry has 11 liters. On the highway, Toyota is more economical by the same 100 ml and consumes 5.9 liters per 100 km. For Honda, this figure is 6 liters. In mixed mode, the difference does not change; for the Camry it is 7.8 liters, for the Accord it is 7.9 liters.
Regarding the operation of the Toyota Camry automatic transmission, we can say that it is a little thoughtful. Honda's 5-speed automatic transmission is faster and has a more confident start and acceleration. Considering that Honda is equipped with a manual transmission, those who like to “drive” cars can rest easy. In addition, the Camry does not have very adequate brakes: at high speeds, in order to brake, you will have to press the pedal very hard. All base engines can also run on 92 gasoline. If you fill the cars with 95, the base unit of the Honda becomes more productive than that of the Toyota.
Convenience versus luxury.
Overall, I would like to say that these two cars are very attractive and have almost the same advantages for a comfortable ride, especially when driving long distances. Despite some simplicity, the Camry car still prevails with its comfort and extremes.
Despite the new and convenient dashboard of the Accord, the Toyota Camry is significantly superior in style. All interior materials, as well as electronic equipment, look higher quality when compared with those on the Accord.
Both cars have a convenient location of all vehicle controls. However, the user interface is still more convenient in a Camry car. And yet, this car has a better sound system, which can be appreciated by music lovers who understand sound quality, especially bass.
Many experts note that the Accord has more comfortable front seats than the Camry, despite their similar dimensions. But the legroom for the driver and front passenger on a Honda car is greater than on a Toyota car.
“Camry” and “Accord” are almost the same in cost, with a few exceptions, i.e. The Accord is a little more expensive than the Camry. But if you take an Accord equipped with a manual transmission, then its price in the minimum configuration will become much cheaper than a Camry car (Toyota does not offer cars with a manual transmission). This distinguishes the Honda Accord from the Toyota Camry in terms of pricing.
Ride quality, maneuverability and handling
After restyling, the Accord's front suspension became softer. At the same time, the steering wheel, which has an electric booster, began to behave extremely correctly, clearly confirming to car owners the higher status of the car. In winding corners the car barely rolls. If it begins to lose traction, it happens very smoothly and allows even an inexperienced driver to react in time and take action.
But the Camry is not so good in this regard. Here, even a too sharp turn will make the car owner nervous. This car needs to be “piloted” very carefully - the car does not like sudden movements. When it moves in a straight line, but the road surface is not ideal, the rear passengers will experience some discomfort, despite the fact that the Camry's suspension is considered soft. The car does not hold its trajectory very well. If there are longitudinal irregularities, he will most likely get off it. So it’s better for the Camry driver not to relax at high speed. Apparently, this car is positioned by the manufacturer for a quiet ride. The Accord is distinguished by dynamism and drive, it has a sportier suspension and precise handling.
By the way, this Toyota failed the American safety test. There, the dummy in the driver's seat especially got it. The Honda Accord's results were quite on par.
Exterior of Toyota Camry and Honda Accord
Exterior of Toyota Camry
Looking at a car, you think about “business”. The front of the car does not look aggressive. The wide hood has a straight cut in front of the grille, which is quite aesthetically pleasing. The solidity of the car can be judged by the horizontal lines of chrome.
You feel confident and calm when you peer into the neat, smooth, soft lines of the wing's head optics. The solid front end is indicated by a large front bumper with neat fog lamps.
The profile is rich, massive and not heavy. The businesslike look is distinguished by the wide doors and classic smooth glass pillars of the car, along the contour of which there is a thin strip of chrome. Medium-sized rectangular side mirrors with soft corners are also available.
The wheel arches are not modest, although they do not contain a large radius stamping. In the rear there are longitudinal brake lights - 2 strips of white and red plastic. Both the side of the wing and even the luggage compartment are affected by the headlights. Such a wonderful design idea is completed with a powerful bumper and exhaust tip.
Exterior View of Honda Accord
The car is distinguished by solid sportiness. The front is marked by drive, aggression and a willingness to move forward. The large radiator grille gives the car a “shield” shape. The designers have very well equipped the element with chrome and the longitudinal lines are slightly bent towards the center. The wide hood, narrow head optics, and blade overhangs of the lower part of the bumper will not make you pass by. The small dots of the fog lights carry the rigor.
The sides of the car are marked with severity and severity using the straight lines of the glazing area and the chrome strip-contour. The door handles are also chrome-plated, multi-level, which indicates the speed of the car.
A car with powerful arches. The rear has excellent tapered optics, similar to the blade of a melee weapon. Sportiness and solidity are conveyed by the familiar shield with a stamp in the place where the number is attached and a powerful bumper.
Toyota Camry is at once a calm sedan for business and a powerful, dynamic car that gives confidence. This is an excellent option for both young drivers and calmer older drivers.
It is the Honda Accord that will become the favorite of both young people and mature, more respectable owners. The modernity and rigor of the car’s design makes it possible to call it “high-tech”. This is an exemplary car for cutting through the roads of big cities.
If you compare Camry and Accord, the second one will win, since it is its design that remains relevant for decades. This car combines all the best.
Comparison of configurations and prices
Prices for Camry have increased in proportion to all other new cars on the Russian market. Now for the most affordable version of the Camry, called “Standard”, with a 2-liter power unit and a 5-speed automatic transmission, you will have to pay 1.58 million rubles. Other equipment in this model is quite decent: 2-zone climate system, 16-inch alloy, heated front seats, all-round visibility and parking sensors, as well as a decent audio system. By paying an additional 70 thousand you can buy “Standard Plus”, which has cruise control, light sensors, rain sensors and other options. The next “Classic” package comes with leather upholstery and electrically adjustable front seats. You will have to pay another 80 thousand rubles for it, and if you take it with a 2.5-liter engine, then another 110 thousand. It costs from 1.84 million rubles. The flagship modification (Executive Safety) will cost 2.5 million rubles. In this configuration, the car will have all possible options, starting with a 3.5-liter engine and ending with electronic road assistants.
There is nothing to say yet about the current prices for the Accord in Russia. Currently, the model is not officially supplied to the Russian car market. Although, information has spread on the Internet that sales of the car will be resumed at the end of this year. As for the modifications, the basic version of Elegance has a keyless entry system and engine start with the Start/Stop button, two large touch screens, climate control, heated and servo side mirrors, heated front seats, light and precipitation sensors, cruise control. control and eight airbags. The Executive package is additionally equipped with a leather interior, an electric sunroof, and parking sensors front and rear. The flagship Premium Navi modification comes with a memory function for the driver's seat, an advanced navigation system, adaptive cruise control and an accident prevention system.
Acceleration and predictability.
has done a lot of work to switch from a traditional automatic transmission to a continuously variable transmission. And I was right. In the global automotive market, most likely this CVT will be one of the best at the moment. The CVT installed on the Accord operates very quietly, and this is due to the constant change in the speed of revolutions per minute, and to avoid the unpleasant and scary hum during acceleration, which is usually inherent in all types of CVTs. Note here that when accelerating hard, the CVT will simulate gear shifting, which helps break up the monotonous sound that is typical of CVT-based gearboxes.
Both of these cars have a sport mode for a more dynamic ride. But unlike the Accord, the Camry car has the ability to switch the gearbox to “manual” mode so that the driver can select the necessary gear for dynamic acceleration of the car.
Despite the fact that the 2013 Toyota Camry that participated in the testing weighed as much as 100 kilograms less, in comparison with the Honda Accord, its fuel consumption in reality after the tests was higher. For example, under the same test conditions, the fuel consumption of a Toyota Camry was 10.06 liters per 100 kilometers, while the fuel consumption of a Honda Accord did not exceed 9.29 liters per 100 kilometers.
Also, when testing cars for acceleration in a straight line, the best dynamics were shown by the Honda, which picked up speed much more easily, unlike the Camry. This will seem strange, especially because the Accord has a CVT. Most likely, the fact is that Toyota’s automatic transmission is not optimally configured, which at average speed does not allow the car to accelerate with the same nimbleness and ease.
Maintenance costs
These cars with similar engines are very similar in fuel consumption. However, since the Honda Accord is definitely more expensive in price than the Camry, the transport tax on it is much higher, especially for the top-end configuration. To complete the picture, you can compare maintenance costs, which will greatly depend on mileage. If we assume that they travel about 30 thousand kilometers per year, and all necessary maintenance will be done at the dealer’s expense, then taking into account compulsory motor insurance, gasoline costs and transport tax, the average cost per kilometer for a Camry will be about 8.5 rubles, and for an Accord - about 9.
Toyota Camry configurations and prices
| Equipment | Engine | Volume, l | Power, hp | checkpoint | Drive unit | Acceleration to 100 km/h, c. | Max. speed, km/h | Consumption per 100 km, l | Price, rub. |
| 2.0 AT Classic | petrol | 2 | 150 | machine | front | 11 | 210 | 9.6 / 5.4 / 6.9 | 1 732 000 |
| 2.0 AT Standard | petrol | 2 | 150 | machine | front | 11 | 210 | 9.6 / 5.4 / 6.9 | 1 574 000 |
| 2.0 AT Standard Plus | petrol | 2 | 150 | machine | front | 11 | 210 | 9.6 / 5.4 / 6.9 | 1 652 000 |
| 2.5 AT Classic | petrol | 2.49 | 181 | machine | front | 9.9 | 210 | 11.4 / 6.3 / 7.9 | 1 837 000 |
| 2.5 AT Lux Safety | petrol | 2.49 | 181 | machine | front | 9.9 | 210 | 11.4 / 6.3 / 7.9 | 2 196 000 |
| 2.5 AT Prestige Safety | petrol | 2.49 | 181 | machine | front | 9.9 | 210 | 11.4 / 6.3 / 7.9 | 2 064 000 |
| 2.5 AT Standard Plus | petrol | 2.49 | 181 | machine | front | 9.9 | 210 | 11.4 / 6.3 / 7.9 | 1 757 000 |
| 2.5 AT Elegance Safety | petrol | 2.49 | 181 | machine | front | 9.9 | 210 | 11.4 / 6.3 / 7.9 | 1 952 000 |
| 3.5 AT Executive Safety | petrol | 3.46 | 249 | machine | front | 7.7 | 220 | 12.4 / 6.3 / 7.9 | 2 500 000 |
| 3.5 ATLux Safety | petrol | 3.46 | 249 | machine | front | 7.7 | 220 | 12.4 / 6.3 / 7.9 | 2 325 000 |
* — information on prices is for reference only. Check with your local dealer for exact pricing.
RESULT.
Either of these two cars is an excellent choice among full-size sedans. If every fraction of a second for acceleration and precise handling is important to you, then you should choose a Honda Accord. If you need comfort combined with a soft suspension combined with a premium interior, then you can opt for the Toyota Camry.
However, you must remember that with any comparison test there is always only one winner. So it is in our case (test). As a result of the testing of two cars by the world's leading automotive experts, as well as taking into account all the feedback from car drivers, the winner in this comparative car test is the Honda Accord.
2013 Honda Accord
pros
| Minuses
|
2013 Toyota Camry
pros
| Minuses
|
Appearance, dimensions
Both selected cars belong to the 9th generation. Any other car would never have dreamed of such a fate, and could be a good reason for the automaker to be proud of itself. For these two cars, it is nothing more than a natural evolution, thanks to which the cars have constantly changed, becoming more and more advanced. Although, the exterior of the modern Camry cannot be called the pinnacle of creative thought. However, it seems that in this case Toyota designers did not intend to create a futuristic car. If only because it can be risky from a sales point of view. They went further along the beaten path, understanding perfectly what the consumer wanted. What he wants is a huge, beautiful sedan without any fancy decorative elements. The Toyota body is distinguished by strict lines and the absence of any frills. And this is correct and good in its own way. However, on the other hand, few people today will look at the Camry that has driven by. Well, Camry, and Camry, what's wrong?
The Honda model was like this two generations ago. Now it's a completely different car. Laconic forms have sunk into oblivion. The sides are decorated with diagonal stampings, which attract attention and make the silhouette of the Japanese sedan slender and modern. The hood part has become larger, the rear part has become more recognizable due to the interesting placement of the rear lights and the appearance of two muffler pipes. In short, this Honda has become much more interesting, having received dimensions, wheelbase and a range of power plants similar to its competitor. So in terms of exterior, the Accord definitely wins.
Salon and trunk
Inside, the general trends remain the same. For Toyota, it’s just a comfortable driver’s workplace without any special design flourishes. There is an overabundance of wood-like plastic here, which one of the designers seems to be promoting with manic persistence. When it is combined with ordinary plastic, there is a strong impression that the Camry is an extension of the office, and not a car. The location of the control buttons takes some time to get used to, but is quickly remembered. The atypically configured center console deserves attention. The instrument panel is made in a classic style, but all instruments are easy to read. You can choose from two design options – dark and light.
It's funny, but the Accord's interior is even more spartan. There is also wood-look plastic here, but its two-tone design looks quite solid. At the same time, the front panel does not look particularly elegant. The center console is distinguished from other models only by its cascade arrangement. At first it can attract attention. On the other hand, the finishing materials used in the interior are of very high quality. It all looks very impressive, but from a functionality point of view, it is somewhat doubtful. Using two color screens on the center console is a rather non-trivial solution. You get used to it pretty quickly, just like you get used to the Toyota's slow touchscreen. The top screen of the Honda displays useful information, and the bottom screen contains multimedia controls.
Visibility in both Japanese sedans is very good. However, the Accord has a camera built into the right mirror that improves orientation in traffic. One of the disadvantages of the Honda is that the trunk lid can only be opened from the interior. Some people may not like it. There is no alternative. In addition, the Honda trunk is inconvenient, as it is very narrow at the front where it meets the rear seat.
Toyota's luggage compartment is more thoughtful. Although it is only 10 liters larger, it seems that its capacity is much greater. However, there are also disadvantages here - the hinges on the luggage compartment lid are too voluminous. If you pack the trunk too tightly, they can damage your luggage. We must take this into account. The rear end of a Toyota cannot be transformed. There is only a small window through which one or two pairs of skis can fit. The Accord does this better - the back of the sofa can be reclined. In this case, the control lever is located in the trunk, and not in the cabin. Although, a wide plane does not work here either. Both the pros and cons of car interiors are generally balanced. Therefore, there is no clear favorite in comparison based on this indicator.
Car interior decoration
Getting into the interior of the Toyota Camry Hybrid, you immediately notice the high quality of the finishing materials - the panels are trimmed with soft plastic and eco-leather, there are stylish inserts made of pseudo-wood, aluminum and a glossy finish on parts. The assembly also does not disappoint and pleases with minimal, even panel gaps.
The organization of the driver's space is logical and precise - there are no problems with ergonomics. If we talk about the cockpit architecture, it is modern and combines elegance and fidelity to tradition.
The most impressive part of the front panel is the multi-sized center console with a widescreen multimedia touchscreen. The latter manages the navigation functions, audio system, 360-degree video camera system and on-board electronics.
The instrument panel with a silver frame also has a large on-board computer monitor - its graphics are beautiful and its functionality is varied. Analog devices are simple in appearance, but are quite readable under any conditions.
The front seats with plump lateral support are comfortable for people of almost any size, but for riders taller than 190 centimeters, the range of longitudinal adjustment may not be enough. The flat-profile second-row seat comfortably accommodates three passengers, but again, very tall people will find their knees tight.
The interior of the Honda Accord Hybrid is not as refined as its opponent and, first of all, this concerns the finishing. Many parts are made of hard plastic, and the leather is rough in places. However, the “wood and aluminum inserts” also look good, and the panels fit quite precisely.
Two color monitors on the dashboard create a feeling of chaos, meanwhile, from the point of view of using the questions to them, there is a minimum and each is responsible for its own functions: the top one projects a rear view camera, navigation indications, the bottom one projects information from the audio complex.
At the head of the instrument panel there is a dial speedometer with an on-board computer inside, and on the sides there are digital diagrams of the charge level of the power plant, gasoline and coolant. The “toolkit” looks interesting and beautiful.
The front seats are simple in appearance, but very comfortable in terms of seating, regardless of body type. The rear sofa can comfortably accommodate only two people with a height of up to 185 centimeters.
Which is better to choose? (pros and cons of one and the other)
To summarize the comparison, we can say that the 9th generation Accord is for active people who love fast driving, which is placed above comfort. Of course, here he is at a fairly high level. Honda is superior in safety to its competitor. When the tenth generation appears, it will certainly arouse even greater interest among Russian car enthusiasts, especially if the price tag for the car becomes closer to the cost of its competitor.
Camry is worth buying for those people who like to travel on the road with maximum comfort. The active safety systems here are quite decent. But the passive one let us down, as the American test showed. The car is intended for lovers of leisurely driving who do not like quick lane changes, fast cornering, etc. This is precisely what car sales on the Russian market testify to. Whichever car attracts more attention, the Honda Accord or the Toyota Camry, a comparison of the main characteristics will help to better evaluate both Japanese sedans from the point of view of a motorist.
Which model, who and when is better to buy?
Those who are planning to buy a car are wondering what is better to choose, a Toyota Camry or a Honda Accord. The answer to this question is quite complex. Much depends on the following points:
- Manufacturer preferences.
- Driving style.
- Personal preferences regarding technical parameters.
- Financial condition.
Representatives and businessmen should choose Toyota Camry. The car looks more presentable. If your budget is limited and you want to buy a good car, then you should choose Honda. This option is also suitable for those who do not care about the power and acceleration speed of the car.
Video
Comparison of basic configurations
| Function | Honda Accord (2.0 AT Base), Japan | (2.0 AT Standard) |
| EUR (steering) | ✔ | ✔ |
| Front-camera | ✔ | No |
| Hill Start Assist Control (HAC) | ✔ | No |
| LED headlights | ✔ | ✔ |
| LED daytime running lights | ✔ | ✔ |
| Rear parking sensors | ✔ | No |
| Anti-lock system (ABS) | There is | ✔ |
| Electronic Brake Force Distribution (EBD) | ✔ | ✔ |
| Front parking sensors | ✔ | No |
| Cruise control | ✔ | No |
| Leather interior | ✔ | No |
| Stability Control (ESP) | ✔ | ✔ |
| Blind Spot Monitoring System | ✔ | No |
| LED rear lights | ✔ | ✔ |
| Brake Assist System (BAS) | ✔ | ✔ |
| Keyless entry into the car | ✔ | No |
Author: Alexey Podshivalov
Sophistication and comfort
The Honda Accord's steering is much stiffer and more informative than the soft and light steering wheel in the Toyota Camry. But if we talk about the suspension, then in the Camry it is more comfortable compared to the Honda. Plus, the Camry has much better sound insulation.
It's also worth noting that the battle between the two competing models has long been fought over cargo space in the trunk, as well as rear-seat legroom, which is virtually identical in both cars.
The only thing that auto experts who tested the cars noted was that the Camry has more room in the back seat due to the higher ceiling height.
In addition, it is worth noting that Toyota has made it possible to fold the rear seats individually, unlike Honda where the rear seat folds in one piece.
Tall drivers will be more or less comfortable in both cars. True, experts noted that in the Camry there is no way to lower the seat low enough so that a tall driver does not rest his head on the ceiling. This is of course a plus for shorter drivers, who will be very comfortable driving the new model, getting better visibility. But it seems to us that the manufacturer should have thought not only about short people.
