Toyota Corolla what gasoline to fill

The Toyota Corolla 120 line of power plants is designed taking into account the optimal ratio of liter power and efficiency. The car's fuel consumption is comparable to other models that have a similar engine size and vehicle weight. The engine provides good dynamic performance, thanks to which the driver feels confident on the highway and in city traffic.

The car owner must treat the fuel being filled as responsibly as possible. The stability and durability of the power plant and related systems depend on the correct choice of fuel. A one-time refueling of a car with low-quality or adulterated fuel can damage the fuel filter, injectors, catalytic converter and significantly reduce the service life of the engine.

An increase in gasoline consumption is a symptom that signals the need to pay attention to the condition of the Corolla 120 components. Eliminating the breakdown at an early stage will avoid the failure of expensive parts, so it is not recommended to delay repairs.

What kind of gasoline should I use?

Good day everyone.
I just sold my Gets and bought a 2007 Toyota Corolla. So, the former owner says he poured 92 gasoline, but the book says to pour 95 or higher. Tell me which one should be poured better. Thanks in advance. to krotov:

Moved it to the Corollas section, because we are no longer talking about Getz, you sold Getz.

Dynamics

Toyota Corolla cars released in 2010 demonstrate high quality, like previous generations. But they differ in new technical characteristics: modern design, comfortable interior and excellent dynamics.

Toyota Corolla 150 dorestyle

Toyota Corolla is probably the only car produced abroad that has been popular with buyers for several decades. The Japanese showed the world the first Corolla back in 1974, then the car was as simple as a traffic jam, but almost everyone liked it. During the entire production of the Corolla, the car was restyled 12 times, the last one occurring in 2013. The manufacturer provided 3 engines, as well as 2 gearboxes.

Toyota Corolla black beauty › Logbook › debate 95 or 92 gasoline WHICH IS BETTER.

article from the magazine BEHIND THE DRIVE 2013 number 12

Disputes on the topic: “92nd or 95th?” -gaining strength again. The reason for this is the ever-increasing price difference. In the capital, at the time of preparation of this article, it already exceeded 3 rubles per liter. In addition, some manufacturers indicate 92nd gasoline as acceptable and recommended. Naturally, such cars were also found in the editorial office. In order to dot the i’s, a Chevrolet-Cobalt and a Nissan-Almera were sent to the test site. The purpose of the races is to find out how much more economical an engine running on A95 gasoline will be compared to A92 and whether higher-octane fuel promises benefits in monetary terms. To ensure the correctness of the measurements, the test site was chosen as a test site, since it is very difficult to achieve the same driving conditions on public roads, which means that the results obtained on different types of fuel will be incorrect. Therefore, we set out to make circles on the high-speed ring, alternating uniform movement (130 km/h) with acceleration and braking. Measurements in the laboratory on running drums were deliberately abandoned: we are interested in the results obtained under normal conditions. We are not talking about the ceremonial figures that are given in reference books, but about the real average, which usually serves as the answer to the question: how much does the car eat? We fill the tank full and drive until the car stops. By the way, we buy gasoline of different brands at the same gas station. To insure against illegal fuel at a network gas station of a well-known manufacturer. So, Almera drank a 50-liter tank of A95 gasoline in 454 km. Converted to liters per hundred - average consumption is 11.01 l/100 km. The Cobalt with a 6-speed gearbox suddenly turned out to be more voracious than the Nissan with an ancient 4-speed automatic: 432 km and 11.57 l/100 km. We repeat the race - in A92 tanks. The results are unexpected: 469 km and 10.66 l/100 km for the “Japanese”, 457 km and 10.94 l/100 km for the “American”. amazing discrepancy with theory: a noticeable difference in favor of cheaper fuel! Here there is no need to convert into rubles - the choice is obvious, because for the “fifth” to be more profitable in terms of money, its consumption should be at least a liter more modest. Perhaps A98 promises savings? Of course, pouring it into budget sedans is somehow out of character, but for the sake of experimentation - what if... Fuel consumption turned out to be the lowest - 10.53 l/100 km for the Almera and 10.64 l/100 km for the Cobalt . But if you count it in rubles, then there is no smell of profit here. And if the results for A98 are not surprising, then the situation with the other two varieties is strange. Therefore, we chose a gas station of another, no less well-known company and filled the cans again. Based on the results of the next hundred kilometers, the Nissan-Almera spent 10.34 liters per hundred on the A92 and 10.35 liters on the A95, the Chevrolet Cobalt - 10.2 and 10.28 l respectively. Now it's closer to the theory. If we do not take into account the measurement error, the appetites of cars on both brands of fuel are the same. But again, high-octane gasoline does not provide any savings: neither in liters, nor, what is even more offensive, in rubles. This applies to at least two tested cars - 92 gasoline is really the most profitable for them. It is possible that the conclusion will be valid for most models in which the manufacturer allows gasoline not lower than A92. And refueling with more expensive fuel, at best, will only give an increase in dynamics. Although, with certain engine settings, the 95 can also declare its efficiency. Check it in your car, even on public roads. The effort will pay off in any case.

What kind of gasoline should I put in a 100 Corolla (4e-fe)

They just scared me that the valves would burn out))) so I started thinking - while I was pouring 92. At 95 I felt amazing savings in gasoline - in the city it was about 7 liters, when at 92 it was about 10-11 liters. tell me please)))

any gasoline from AI-91 and higher. nothing will burn out.

Dark_elf777
Sanya, I can’t calculate the benefits in terms of money, whose are you and what are you paying for the 95th??

98 is not worth the valves, they can burn out, if at 95 such savings are made and lei if it is normal.

kadem I usually always pour Sibneft.. 92 at 19.50 and the 95 seems to be 21.50 I never looked at the price tag - I pour for even amounts (100-500 rubles)

I always pour even liters :)))

here is an excerpt from an article in the magazine “ZA RUBLE” IS THIS POSSIBLE OR HOW? What will happen if you fill in 95 instead of A-92 gasoline? Will the valves burn out? Nothing will happen... Old misconceptions about such a terrible danger are drawn from the experience of using leaded high-octane gasoline in engines tuned to 76. The difference in octane number - 12 units, obtained by tetraethyl lead, significantly suppressed the combustion rate and increased the temperature of the exhaust gases and exhaust valves. Today we are talking only about the cost of gasoline. The real difference in octane numbers is only 2-3 units, and therefore there will be practically no decrease in the combustion rate noticeable to the engine. Moreover, if the increase in octane number is achieved by adding ethers - and now this is most often the case - then the combustion rate will be even higher. This results in slight fuel savings plus some reduction in exhaust emissions. The resulting detonation margin, on the contrary, reduces the likelihood of burnout of pistons and valves. What if you fork out for the A-98 instead of the A-92? In principle, it’s possible, but it doesn’t make much sense. A-98 is specially made for forced gasoline engines. Let's say, tune the engine, “tighten” it in terms of compression ratio, install camshafts with “wide phases”, then yes, there is no other way. Without this, it is an empty transfer of money. Switching back to low-octane gasoline should be regarded as a backup option - this is also what the instructions for most modern cars say. As for the talk that spark plugs fail more often at 95, they are caused by the practice of dealing with “ferrocene” gasolines - nothing like that will happen with “ether” gasolines! Unfortunately, in our country the quality of gasoline is often determined not by the octane number, but by the integrity of the manufacturer and seller...

and here is a link to the article itself - the topicstarter’s question is described in some detail

Engines

Engine Toyota 1NR-FE

The 2007 Toyota Corolla has been in great demand since its launch; car enthusiasts prefer this car, which has reliability, safety and a good set of technical characteristics.

Toyota designers and engineers care about car drivers. The car is equipped with everything necessary to ensure that trips at any time of the year remain comfortable and enjoyable.

To perform basic functions, the passenger car was equipped with 4-cylinder engines with low fuel consumption.

In Russia, Corolla E150 cars were officially sold only with gasoline engines and front-wheel drive. Cars with diesel engines were also supplied to Europe.

The 10th generation Toyota Corolla sedan could officially be purchased with three engines:

1.3 l, gasoline 1NR-FE 101 hp, manual transmission, cylinder diameter - 7.25 cm, piston stroke - 8 cm, compression ratio - 11.5 to 1, maximum torque - 132 Nm;
1.4 l, gasoline 4ZZ-FE 97 horsepower, manual transmission, cylinder diameter - 7.9 cm, piston stroke - 7.1 cm, compression ratio as in the 1.3-liter modification, maximum torque value - 130 Nm. ;
1.6 l, gasoline, 1ZR-FE 124 horses, manual transmission, automatic transmission or robot, cylinder diameter - 8 cm, piston stroke - 7.8 cm, compression ratio - 10.2 to one, maximum torque - 157 Nm.

After restyling in 2010, only two engines remained: 1.3 and 1.6 liters. Models with both types of engines show good efficiency: 6-7 liters of consumption per hundred kilometers.

I've been driving the car for three months. It was 92 all the time. I decided to try the 95th - my Filya became faster, but not significantly. Tell me: what is good and what is bad between 92 and 95; what are the pros and cons of mixing them etc?

When you wash the car, it also starts to run faster

I tried 95 and didn’t notice the difference, I don’t see the point in interfering. 92 is recommended for them. IMHO.

According to the book, at least 95 is recommended for 2ZZ-GE only.

I know that 92nd is recommended. I also don’t consider the new agility to be a big plus (since the agility itself is not significant). What about the opinion that 95th in Russia is about 92nd in countries a little more developed than Russia (for example, Japan :))? I myself have no complaints about the 92nd, I just wanted to try it myself and feel the difference.

Well, yes, but 95 is 92 with an additive of Chinese ferrocene. From which the spark plugs come from, etc.

Thank you! I also really like to joke.

“”Now Chinese ferrocenes are being sent to Russia by the ton. No one even remembers the permitted dose of 18 mg/l - because there is virtually no one to check and punish the “bodyaniks”. And the benefits are fantastic! For example, a triple dose of an iron-containing additive is enough to obtain “almost normal” AI-95 from AI-92 gasoline. Or - “distill” AI-95 into AI-98.”

It’s true that they also write about 92 from 80.

I drive at 95 all the time, once in the cold I filled it with 92, I didn’t feel the difference. Maybe I’m refueling the 95m in vain?

And many more wrote that in cold weather at 92 it starts better.

I’ve been filling up with 96 at NEFTEPRODUKTE for 2 years and I don’t worry.

95 is 92+chemistry. in general, many (not all) companies that do not produce, but buy gasoline, carry only 80, but sell 80,92,95. accordingly they do it themselves.

It starts better on the 92nd - fact. It evaporates better. And in general, the overpayment for the 95th is not worth that dubious increase in power IMHO. But on the 96 my engine runs quieter. And the consumption is absolutely the same, whether it’s the 92nd or the 96th.

Yesterday it was 92 again. It seems like no difference is felt anymore. And when there is no difference, why pay more? )

at 95 the lambda probe and spark plugs fail faster, I only at 92

pilot, who told you this, or did you guess it yourself? (c) Give your reasons.

Why is there any argument here? There was a lot of talk - it all depends on the specific seller/manufacturer, but it seems that according to the statistics of forum discussions - the 92nd is less loaded - therefore, it starts better and the engine life, and the fact that the 95th turns into 92nd in the tank within a day. generalization is simple